RAJJUAULLAH AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA

AMIT RANA 2026.05.26 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judgement/order CRM M-30793-2026 2 admitted case of the prosecution, the petitioners had caused simple injuries to the injured in the present case. He further contends that even the injury which attracted the offence under Section 118(2) of BNS was attributed to Tohid, co-accused, who had allegedly caused injury with a Farsa on the fingers of left hand of Liaqat Ali, injured. Learned counsel further contends that the petitioners had earlier surrendered before the police and recoveries, if any, were already made from them and they were ordered to be released on regular bail by the police itself. Now, the offence under section 118(2) of BNS has been added and the petitioners again apprehended their arrest in the present case. He further contends that the petitioners had already joined the investigation and no recovery was to be effected from them. Their custodial interrogation may not be required in the present case. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel assisted by learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners on the ground that