Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-05

RAJIV KHOKHAR @ RAJIV vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 19964/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJIV KHOKHAR @ RAJIV
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-19964-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 213 CRM-M-19964-2026 (O&M) Date of decision:05.05.2026 Rajiv Khokhar @ Rajiv ... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Rajat Dogra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Tanveer Singh, Advocate for the complainant. ... Manisha Batra, J. (Oral). 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by the petitioner seeking grant of anticipatory bail in case arising out of FIR No.13, dated 31.01.2026, registered under Sections 109, 115(2), 191(3) and 190 of the BNS and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, at Police Station 'A' Division, Amritsar, District Amritsar. 2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of statement recorded by the complainant – Kanwaljit Singh, alleging therein that he was working as a driver for Gurjit Singh and used to drive his vehicle. On the intervening night of 30/31.01.2026, he had loaded one machine on his vehicle at Majitha Road Amritsar and was going towards HARJEET KAUR 2026.05.06 10:05 I attest to the