Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-15

RAJIV KAPOOR AND ANOTHER vs VIJAY LUXMI GARG

Citation / case number
CR 4107/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJIV KAPOOR AND ANOTHER
Respondent
VIJAY LUXMI GARG
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

2026: PHHC:077169 pte Bee CR-4107-2026 (O&M) -1- See 117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-10283-CII-2026 in/and CR-4107-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.05.2026 Rajiv Kapoor and Another ....+--Petitioners Versus Vijay Luxmi Garg .+..-e Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN Present: Mr. Fateh Sahota, Advocate, Ms. Kawal Dhillon, Advocate and Mr. Didar Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. (Oral) RKEK 1. Present civil revision has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 30.04.2026 (Annexure P-18) passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kharar, in Execution Proceeding bearing No. EXE-259-2025, whereby the application for staying the execution proceedings was dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that recovery suit of the respondent-plaintiff was decreed vide ex-parte order dated 30.11.2203 passed by Civil Judge, Patiala. Thereafter, the petitioner on coming to know about the ex-parte decree, filed an application under Order 9 Rule 13, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 before the trial Court Patiala, for setting aside the ex-pa