Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-05

RAJIV JOHRI AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 40141/2023
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJIV JOHRI AND OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

263 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-40141-2023 Date of Decision: 05.05.2026 RAJIV JOHRI AND OTHERS ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Nitin Sansanwal, Advocate for Mr. Baljeet Beniwal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Ramesh Kumar, DAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of the FIR No.13 dated 14.05.2012 under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 120-B of IPC, 1860 and 13(1) D, PC Act, 1988 registered at Police Station State Vigilance Bureau Gurugram, District Palwal. On 04.09.2023, the following order was passed:- “In compliance of order dated 01.09.2023 counsel for the petitioners placed on record detail of paid up share capital today in the Court, which is taken on record. Copy of the same has been supplied to State counsel. List on 06.11.2023. State to file reply by the next date of hearing. The petitioners are permitted to appear before the trial Court subject to the condition that the petitioners shall not claim any prejudice in this regard in any Court. Trial Court shall not insist the peti