Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-26

RAJESH KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CWP 16816/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJESH KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

127 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16816 of 2026 Date of decision: 26.05.2026 Rajesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present :- Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate Ms. Bhargavi, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(Oral) 1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner, from the date of his eligibility as per policy issued by the State of Haryana dated 18.06.2014 (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to the respondent/State to decide the legal notice dated 13.03.2026 (Annexure P-7) in view the dictum laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 1996 of 2024 titled Madan Singh and Others vs. State of Haryana and Others, along with a bunch of connected appeals. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Since the official respondents were served with an advance SEEMA SHARMA 2026.05.30 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and authentici