RAJESH KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP-11131-2001 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (224) CWP-11131-2001 Date of Decision : 05.05.2026 Rajesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Sehaj Bir Singh, Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel) and Ms. Muskan Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kapil Bansal, DAG, Haryana. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner/workman, fetching grievance from the award dated 26.09.2000 (Annexure P-6), passed by respondent No.2, wherethrough, the reference was answered against him, has approached this Court, challenging its legality, by filing the instant writ petition, under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India. 2. Learned Tribunal, through the award (supra), has observed that the petitioner/workman, has not completed minimum 240 days, in the preceding year, from the date of termination of his services, and therefore, has declined to grant any relief to him. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner/workman, at the very outset, has drawn the attention of this Court towards the muster rolls (Exh.W-1 to Exh.W-21), which were produced by Sh. Dharam Pal, Accounts Clerk, who stepped i