Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-11

RAJEEV SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 216/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJEEV SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-216-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-216-2026 Date of decision: 11.05.2026 RAJEEV SINGH ......PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA ..... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present: Mr. Bipan Ghai, Sr., Advocate with Mr. Nikhil Ghai, Advocate and Mr. Akhil Godara, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate for the complainant. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. 1. This petition for pre-arrest bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.399 dated 07.07.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 420, 406, 120-B of Indian Penal Code, Police Station DLF, District Gurugram. 2. Briefly stating the facts emerging from record are that the FIR of this case came into being at the instance of ‘Saeen Das Rampal @ S.D. Rampal Singh’, hereinafter being referred to as ‘complainant’ only. VIPIN KUMAR 2026.05.12 20:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-216-2026 2 3. The pith and substance of above-mentioned complaint was t