RAJAT vs CANARA BANK AND OTHERS

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 115 CWP-13191-2026 Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 RAJAT …Petitioner Versus CANARA BANK AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Balkar Singh, Advocate for petitioner Ms. Rahish Pahwa, Advocate For respondent Nos. 1 & 2 - Canara Bank *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking directions to de-freeze his Bank Account maintained with respondent No.2 - Canara Bank. 2. Reply dated 26.05.2026 filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent- Bank has frozen petitioner’s account without notice. As per petitioner’s information, the Bank has acted upon directions of Law Enforcement Agencies. He is not involved in any criminal activity. He is not named in any FIR relating to financial fraud, if any, committed by unknown persons. There SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.05.26 15:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- are multiple entries amounting to ₹59,727/