RAJAN KUMAR vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

126(U) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-17662-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 Rajan Kumar .....Petitioner Versus Union of India and Another ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Abhinav Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner (Through V.C.). Mr. Satya Pal Jain, ASG (Through V.C.) with Mr. Neha Sharma, SPC for the respondent-UOI. Mr. Abhay Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking directions to de-freeze his Bank Account maintained with respondent-State Bank of India. 2. Mr. Abhay Gupta, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.2 and has filed his memorandum of appearance. Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent-Bank has frozen petitioner’s account without notice. As per petitioner’s information, the Bank has acted upon directions of Law Enforcement Agencies. He is not involved in any criminal activity. He is not named in any FIR relating to financial fraud, if any, committed by unknown