RAJ SINGH @ RAJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER vs SATBIR SINGH AND OTHERS

CR-4488-2026 (O&M) -:1:- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (125) CR-4488-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:26.05.2026 RAJ SINGH @ RAJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER … Petitioner(s) Versus SATBIR SINGH AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s) -.- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Sandeep Antehri, Advocate with Mr. Ritender Rathee, Advocate for the petitioners. -.- VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. The instant revision petition has been instituted under Article 227 of the Constitution of India invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court to assail the order dated 01.04.2026 (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kaithal, whereby the application preferred by the petitioners under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, “CPC”) seeking rejection of the plaint came to be dismissed. 2. The factual matrix, in brief, is that the respondent–plaintiff instituted a suit seeking a decree for declaration, joint possession and permanent injunction, inter alia, on the plea that the suit property constituted ancestral and coparcenary property of a Joint Hindu Family and that, being a coparcener, he possessed a birthright the