RAJ MUHAMMAD vs STATE OF PUNJAB

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 129 CRM-M-55450-2025 Date of Decision: 12.05.2026 RAJ MUHAMMAD ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Ankit Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Brar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Atwal, DAG, Punjab. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State Counsel submits that neither the dates on which the petitioner remained absent have been mentioned nor has the fact that as to whether after the presentation of challan the petitioner had presented himself before the Court nor have the statements of the I.O. and the serving constable been placed on record, in view of which, learned counsel prays for withdrawal of the present petition to file the same afresh with better particulars. 2. Ordered accordingly. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) MAY 12, 2026. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.05.13 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order