Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-05

RAJ KUMAR vs STATE OF UT, CHANDIGARH

Citation / case number
CRM-M 20056/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJ KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF UT, CHANDIGARH
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-20056-2026 -1- 226 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-20056-2026 Date of Decision: 05.05.2026 Raj Kumar ..... Petitioner Versus U.T., Chandigarh .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Kshitiz Goel, Advocate, Mr. Vinit Jain, Advocate and Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, Public Prosecutor, UT Chandigarh. SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (ORAL) 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, during the pendency of trial, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed hereunder:- Name of FIR No. Date Section(s) Police District petitioner Station Raj Kumar 11 03.04.2025 318(4), 336(3), EOW Chandigarh 338, 339, 340(2), 61(2) (238, 111, 316(4) of BNS, 2023 later on added) 2. The present FIR was registered at the instance of complainant Gurwinder Singh (SDM), Kharar who stated that they had maintained a joint bank account in IndusInd Bank, Sector 8, Chandigarh with National SANJAY 2026.05.07 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-2