RAJ KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB

RSA-987-1993 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-987-1993 (O&M) RAJ KUMAR ......Appellant Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. .....Respondent Reserved on : 14.05.2026 Pronounced on: 21.05.2026 Uploaded on: 27.05.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Anupam Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gautam Pathania, Advocate Mr. Sukhpal Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG, Punjab for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Respondent No.4 was proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 01.09.1993. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. 1. The present regular second appeal is preferred against judgment and decree dated 24.12.1992 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Patiala, whereby the appeal filed against judgment and decree dated 14.10.1991 passed by learned Sub-Judge, First Class, Patiala was allowed. 2. Brief facts of the case as per the pleadings in civil suit are that appellant was originally appointed as Medical Officer in PCMS-II vide order dated 01.01.1970 and he joined as such. Thereafter on 16.02.1970, his services were regularize