RAJ KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA

“1 2026:PHHC:067613 ae CRM-M-10687-2026 a IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 205 CRM-M- 10687-2026 Date of decision: 01.05.2026 RAJ KUMAR ....-Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Suryakant Gautam, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. 2k ook 2 ok RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 read with Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0417 dated 30.12.2025, registered under Section 306 of the BNS, 2023, at Police Station Murthal, Sonepat. 2. This Court vide order dated 06.04.2026 had directed the petitioner to join the investigation within a week and to cooperate with the investigating agency but the petitioner did not comply with the order passed by this Court and vide order dated 21.04.2026 the petitioner was granted another opportunity to join the investigation. 3. At this juncture, learned State counsel, on instructions from investigating officer, has submitted that the petitioner has again not joined the investigation in terms of the orders dated 06.04.2026 and