Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-22

RAJ KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

Citation / case number
CWP 5140/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJ KUMAR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CWP-5140-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.106 CWP-5140-2026 Date of Decision: 22.05.2026 Raj Kumar .... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Raj Kumar, petitioner in person. (through video conferencing) Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to step up and refix the petitioner’s pay on the promotional post of Deputy Director (Vocational Education), Group-A, and release all consequential benefits. 2. The petitioner, appearing in person, submits that at this stage, he will be satisfied in case he is permitted to make a fresh representation before the respondents raising the grievance as has been raised in this petition, and the same may be ordered to be decided within a specified period 3. Notice of motion. 4. Learned State counsel accepts notice and submits that in case any such representation is filed by the petitioner within two weeks from today, the same will be decided by respondent no.2 – Director, Skill Development and I