RAJ KUMAR vs SATISH KUMAR

CR-6859-2024 (O&M) [1] 330 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6859-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.05.2026 Raj Kumar ...Petitioner Versus Satish Kumar ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Ms. Tejaswini, Advocate for the petitioner. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 21.09.2024 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bhiwani, whereby the application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff seeking police help to implement the order of injunction, has been dismissed. ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER:- 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the present case, the petitioner was tenant of the premises in question and also had a rent note dated 14.05.2018 in his favour showing that the petitioner is the tenant. It is submitted that when respondent intended to take forcible possession, the petitioner had filed the present suit for permanent injunction and along with the said suit, had filed an application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. It is submitted that the trial Cou