Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

RAJ KUMAR vs RAKESH GOEL AND ORS

Citation / case number
FAO 500/2011
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJ KUMAR
Respondent
RAKESH GOEL AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

DAILY LOK ADALAT BENCH NO.3 513 FAO-500-2011 (O&M) RAJ KUMAR V/S RAKESH GOEL AND ORS Present: None for the appellant. Mr.D.K.Prajapati, Advocate for the Insurance company. Nobody appears for the appellant. Notice issued to the appellant has been received back with the report that address of the appellant as given in the Memo of Parties does not exist and even otherwise, no person with the name of Raj Kumar son of Tulsi Prasad is found in Sector 3, Panchkula. Similar report was given in the year 2024. Learned counsel for the Insurance company states that address of the appellant as given in the Memo of Parties is only available with the Insurance company. In these circumstances, it is not possible even to serve the appellant. As such, the appeal is ordered to be consigned to record with liberty to the appellant to get it revived, if so advised, by moving an appropriate application. A copy of this order be sent to learned counsel for the parties as also to the last known addresses of the appellant. (M.S. CHAUHAN) PRESIDENT (B.S. WALIA) MEMBER 04.05.2026 sd SUDHIR KUMAR 2026.05.05 13:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document