Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21

RAJ KUMAR vs K.A.P. SINHA IAS & ORS

Citation / case number
COCP 2531/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJ KUMAR
Respondent
K.A.P. SINHA IAS & ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

COCP-2531-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 116 COCP-2531-2026 Date of Decision: 21.05.2026 Raj Kumar .…Petitioner Versus KAP Sinha and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. A.K. Yadav and Ms. Suman Agnihotri, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of order dated 09.04.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Court in CWP-1902-2017, titled as ‘Raj Kumar vs. State of Punjab and others’ whereby the writ petition was disposed of on the statement of learned counsel for the respondent-State of Punjab that petitioner shall be duly considered as and when there will be a vacancy to fill up post of reserved category for physically handicapped. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has not being considered. On a Court query, learned counsel for the petitioner has admitted that no vacancy has occurred after passing of the Writ Court order dated 09.04.2024 (Annexure P-1). 3. Heard. RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.25 10:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2531-2026