RAJ KUMAR BATRA vs ANAND PRAKASH

CRA-AS-63-2017 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 244 CRA-AS-63-2017 RAJ KUMAR BATRA ....APPELLANT V/s ANAND PRAKASH ....RESPONDENT Date of decision: 05.05.2026 Date of Uploading: 05.05.2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: None for the appellant/applicant. None for the respondent. ***** SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral) 1. The substantive prayer made in the present appeal reads, thus: “It is respectfully prayed that the present appeal may kindly be allowed by reversing/ modifying the impugned judgment dated 03.04.2014 (Annexure A-1) passed by the Ld. Judicial Magistrate First Class Faridabad (in case No. RBT-6744 of 2010 dated 28.08.2010 u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Police Station NIT Faridabad), as the same being perverse, against law and facts on record and the same is therefore liable to be reversed/ modified by convicting and sentencing the accused person/ respondent as per law, in the interest of justice.” Alongwith an appeal, an application for grant of leave has also been preferred under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C., 1973 2. I have perused the paper-book. 3. Before proceeding to consider the application (for grant of special leave to appeal)/appe