Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04
RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
- Citation / case number
- CRM-M 17722/2026
- Court
- Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Petitioner
- RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS
- Respondent
- STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Judgment text excerpt
CRM-M-17722-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 165(2) CRM-M-17722-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision :04.05.2026 RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS ......PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Saurav Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Kuljinder S. Billing Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. **** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral): 1. The present petition under Section 528 of BNSS, has been filed for quashing of FIR No.85 dated 31.10.2023, under Sections 323, 324, 341, 427, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Kathgarh, District SBS Nagar (Annexure P-1), along with all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom. The quashing of FIR has been sought on the basis of compromise between the parties, (Annexures P-3). 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Case file has also been perused carefully. 3. This Court while issuing notice of motion vide order dated 02.04.2026, had directed the parties to appear before the learned Jurisdiction Magistrate for recording of their statements, with regard to the compromise. VIPIN KUMA