Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CRM-M 17722/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-17722-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 165(2) CRM-M-17722-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision :04.05.2026 RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS ......PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Saurav Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Kuljinder S. Billing Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4. **** SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral): 1. The present petition under Section 528 of BNSS, has been filed for quashing of FIR No.85 dated 31.10.2023, under Sections 323, 324, 341, 427, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Kathgarh, District SBS Nagar (Annexure P-1), along with all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom. The quashing of FIR has been sought on the basis of compromise between the parties, (Annexures P-3). 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Case file has also been perused carefully. 3. This Court while issuing notice of motion vide order dated 02.04.2026, had directed the parties to appear before the learned Jurisdiction Magistrate for recording of their statements, with regard to the compromise. VIPIN KUMA