Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRM-M 18197/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-18197-2026 -1- 302 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18197-2026 Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 Raj Kumar and others ..... Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. Umang Gangwar, Advocate (through VC) for Mr. Sanjev K. Virk, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ekompal Sagoo, AAG, Punjab. Ms. Deepika, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (ORAL) 1. Instant petition has been filed praying for quashing of FIR No.163, dated 11.11.2025 registered under Sections 332(c), 324(4), 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 at Police Station Satnampura, District Kapurthala and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 26.03.2026 (Annexure P-2). 2. The FIR in question was lodged by complainant-respondent No.2 and the investigation commenced thereon. However, with the intervention of respectables, finally the parties arrived at settlement and they resolved their inter se dispute, which is apparent from Annexure P-2. On the basis of the compromise, the petitioners are praying that continuation of these proceedings would be a futile exercise and an abuse