Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

RAJ KUMAR ALIAS RAJU vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation / case number
CRM-M 14096/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJ KUMAR ALIAS RAJU
Respondent
STATE OF PUNJAB
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 159 CRM-M- 14096-2026 Date of decision: 04.05.2026 RAJ KUMAR ALIAS RAJU ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB .... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- | Mr. Manoj K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. 2k 2k 2 2 RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been preferred under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, assailing the impugned order dated 28.02.2017 (Annexure P-4), whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar has declared the petitioner a proclaimed person. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR No.210 dated 16.10.2014 u/s 489A, 489B, 489C of IPC, was registered at PS. Magsudan, District Jalandhar, against the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner had been regularly appearing before the learned trial Court on every date of hearing and had no intention to evade the process of law. He submits that the petitioner absented himself during trial under the impression the matter has been resolved and thereafter, he went to Bangkok in January 2017 for earning his livelihood. Subsequently, on 28.02.2017 (Annexure P- 4), the petiti