Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-26

RAJ KAPOOR MAHATO vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 28836/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAJ KAPOOR MAHATO
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-28836-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 214 CRM-M-28836-2026 Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 RAJ KAPOOR MAHATO ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Ms. Veena Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner. H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under section 483 B.N.S.S. (earlier 439 Cr.P.C.) for grant of interim regular bail in case FIR No. 376 dated 30.10.2025 under Section 18-B (later on added Section 29 of NDPS ) Act registered at Police Station- Sadar Yamuna Nagar Haryana. 2. The case of the prosecution is that co-accused namely Pardeep Kumar Rana was apprehended alongwith 3Kg 750 grams of opium. During investigation, the petitioner was nominated as an accused on the basis of the disclosure statement made by the co-accused and was accordingly implicated in the present case. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR and has been nominated solely on the basis of the disclosure statement of co-accused, which is not admissible in evidence against him. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of RENU