RAJ KAMAL vs M/S DARSHAN LAL CHETAN KUMAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (131) CM-1335-C-2023 in/and RSA-358-2023(O&M) Date of decision:- 22.05.2026 Raj Kamal ……Appellant Versus M/s Darshan Lal Chetan Kumar ……Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL **** Present: Mr. Piyush Setia, Advocate, for the appellant. **** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) CM-1335-C-2023 This is an application for condoning the delay of 65 days in re- filing the appeal. In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 65 days in re-filing the appeal, is condoned. RSA-358-2023(O&M) 1. The present civil revision petition has been filed for setting aside the judgment and decree dated 24.09.2018, passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Abohar as well as judgment and decree dated 13.12.2019, passed by learned District Judge, Fazilka, whereby the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff has been partly decreed and the appeal filed there-against, by the respondent/plaintiff, has been allowed. SHUBHAM 2026.05.25 10:45 I am the author of this document 2. Learned counsel for the appellant placed on record the order dated 05.01.2026, passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Divis