RAHUL RATTAN BANSAL vs STATE OF PUNJAB

n 04.05.2026, this Court had passed the following order:- “Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is a Software Engineer and was in employment of the complainant, however, the softwares being developed, are not patented or his copyright and the amount, he has received in his account from Joel Kurumpak, USA, was returned on the next day itself, for which reference is made to the bank receipts, Annexure P-2. There is also a civil remedy available as per the contract between the parties. The petitioner is not involved in any other case and is ready and willing to join the investigation as and when required by the investigating agency and will cooperate. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.05.18 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State while Mr. Anhad Batta, Advocate appears on behalf of the complainant and made their respective submissions in opposition. Meanwhile, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation on or before 11.05.2026. In the event of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Of