RAHUL INDORA AND ORS. vs THE STATE OF NOT DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 16.05.2026 + CRL.M.C. 1779/2026 RAHUL INDORA AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Barkha Chadha, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF NOT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State with IO/SI Rakesh Kumar. Respondent no.2 (through video conferencing) CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 529/2019 of PS Shahbad Dairy for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. CRL.M.C. 1779/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, Signature Not Verified KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff8 Digitally Signed 01e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.05.16 06:08:03 +05'30' By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:16.05.2026 18:21:43 3. The respondent no.2, appearing through videoconferencing, is identified by IO/SI Rakesh Kumar. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. Marriage between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 stands already dissolved by way of decree of divorce. No child was born from wedlock of petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2. The respondent no.2 submits that she has received full and final settlement amount in lieu of her entire stridhan and maintenance. Respondent no.2 submits