Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-21
RAHUL GAGERNA vs UT OF CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER
- Citation / case number
- CRM-M 29029/2026
- Court
- Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Petitioner
- RAHUL GAGERNA
- Respondent
- UT OF CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER
Judgment text excerpt
CRM-M-29029-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 144 CRM-M-29029-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.05.2026 Rahul Gagerna ...Petitioner Versus U.T., Chandigarh and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present:- Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sumit Jain, APP, U.T., Chandigarh. (Through VC) MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of order dated 19.05.2025 (Annexure P-9), passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chandigarh in case titled as Sidh Logistics v. Boutique Sprit Brands P. Ltd. and other, State vs. Boota Singh, filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘N. I. Act’), whereby the petitioner had been declared a proclaimed person. 2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the material placed on record, it is revealed that on 13.03.2025, since the non- bailable warrants issued against the petitioner were received back unserved, the learned trial Court had ordered for issuance of proclamation again