Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-13

RAGHWINDER SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 24768/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAGHWINDER SINGH
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-24768-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (210-a) CRM-M-24768-2026 (O & M) Date of decision:13.05.2026 Raghwinder Singh .... Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Ms. Tanu Bedi, Advocate, with Mr. Vibhu Agnihotri, Advocate and Mr. Pushp Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Viney Phogat, DAG, Haryana. ***** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The prayer in the present petition under Section 483 BNSS (Section 439 Cr.P.C) is for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.64 dated 10.03.2026 under Sections 303(2) of BNS, 2023 (Section 379 IPC), Sections 32, 33 of the Indian Forest Act (Section 27, 29 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 and Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 has been added) registered at Police Station Chandimandir, District Panchkula. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The petitioner is the whistle blower who informed the authorities regarding the illegal felling of the Kher trees. The co-accused on whose statement the petitioner has SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.05.13 16:58 b