Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

RAGHBIR SINGH vs RAM SINGH AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
CR 7794/2019
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
RAGHBIR SINGH
Respondent
RAM SINGH AND OTHERS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CR-7794-2019 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-7794-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 Raghubir Singh …Petitioner Versus Ram Singh and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Navjeet Singh, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 1 to 6. VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) The instant petition, preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails the Order dated 02.12.2019 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sub-Division, Bilaspur, District Yamuna Nagar, whereby an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘the CPC’) , filed by the petitioner, was dismissed. 2. The petitioner-plaintiff (Raghubir Singh) filed a suit for mandatory injunction directing defendant Nos.1 to 6 to vacate the land/common passage (fully described in the plaint) by removing encroachment and cutting eucalyptus trees planted by said defendants on the said land, situated at Village Pensal, Tehsil-Bilaspur, District Yamuna Nagar as per Jamabandi for DALBIR SINGH 2026.05.29 17.18 I attest to the accuracy and integr