RAGHA vs ST. OF HARYANA AND ORS.

CWP-8129-2001 1 2026:PHHC:086817 Bre te oe IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8129-2001 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 12.05.2026 RAGHA .«sPETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ...RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL. Present: Mr. R.K.Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioner(s) Mr. R.D.Sharma, DAG, Haryana. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (oral) 1. Prayer Jurisdiction of this court has been invoked under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularise the service of the petitioners in accordance with the Government of Haryana instructions dated 27.05.1993. 2. Brief Facts The petitioner was appointed in 1984 as Labourer-cum-chownkidar by the respondent authorities at the rate fixed by the Deputy Commissioner as daily wagers. Since the date of appointment, the petitioner has been working continuously without any break.The grievance of the petitioner is that his services ANURADHA 2026.06.25 05:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-8129-2001 2 have not been regularised despite giving repeated representations wherein similarly placed persons have been granted