Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-11

R KOKDICHEM SANGTAM vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 11900/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
R KOKDICHEM SANGTAM
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

264 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11900-2026 Date of Decision: 11.05.2026 R KOKDICHEM SANGTAM ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Ravi Kumar Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Vinay Saini, AAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) On 06.03.2026, the following order was passed:- “The prayer in the present petition under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 is for setting aside the impugned order dated 23.12.2025 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panchkula in case FIR No.100 dated 21.08.2025 under Sections 75, 66, 66C & 66D of IT Act, 2008 and Sections 318(4) & 61 of BNS, 2023 (Sections 420 and 120-B IPC) and Section 42(3) of the Telecommunications Act, 2023 registered at Police Station Cyber Crime, District Panchkula whereby the bail bonds and surety bonds of the petitioner are cancelled and forfeited to the State and warrants of arrest have been issued against him and notice to his surety has also been issued. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that on account of illness of his mother, the petitioner was unable to appear on 23.12.2025