QUTBUDDIN AND ORS vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 14th May, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 3810/2026 & CRL.M.A. 15447-15448/2026 QUTBUDDIN AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Maroof Ahmad with Mr. Heena Parveen, Advocates with petitioners in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State with SI Manoj Kumar, PS Shaheen Bagh. Respondent No.2 through V.C. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No.32/2021 dated 09.02.2021, registered at Police Station Shaheen Bagh, for commission of offences under Sections 447/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. One Lalji Chaudhary was having a jhuggi on a vacant plot situated at H-11, Khasra No.479, Shram Vihar, Shaheen Bagh, New Delhi. According to him, he was residing there for the last ten years and, on 08.02.2021, accused persons came there and asked him to leave, claiming that the plot belonged to them. Later on, when somebody informed the police about the abovesaid incident, the FIR in question was registered. 3. Charge-sheet has already been filed against eight accused persons and the learned Trial Court has taken cognizance for commission of offences Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 3810/2026 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:16.05.2026 12:30:08 under Sections 427/447/452/34 IPC. 4. The matter has, reportedly, been settled and, therefore, quashing is being sought. 5. Copy of Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 21.04.2026 has been placed on record and as per the settlement terms, the abovesaid FIR was got registered on account of some misunderstanding and the parties have settled their disputes amicably wi