PRITAM SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** 127 CWP-17718-2026 Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 PRITAM SINGH …Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Ms. Vini Rani, Advocate for petitioner Mr. Vikas Arora, D.A.G., Punjab Ms. Anu Chatrath, Senior Advocate with Ms. Dhamanpreet Kaur, Advocate For respondent-M.C. Amritsar *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to grant him compensation for injuries caused by stray dogs. 2. The petitioner claims that on 27.11.2025, stray dogs attacked him. He suffered multiple injuries. He was got admitted in Hospital. He remained in Hospital from 27.11.2025 to 30.11.2025. He has undergone surgery. He is entitled to compensation as per judgment of this Court in “Rajwinder Kaur and Others Vs. State of Haryana”, LawFinder Doc ID # 2379984. SUDEEPAK KUMAR 2026.05.29 17:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document -2- 3. Learned State counsel submits that petitioner has not submitted requisite documents and straight away approached this Co