Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-27

PRAKASH vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 29277/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
PRAKASH
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-29277-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.227 CRM-M-29277-2026 Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 PRAKASH ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- Mr. Kunal Muthreja, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 483 BNSS seeking grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.0442 dated 20.12.2025 registered under Sections 318(4) and 61(2) of the BNS, 2023 along with Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (added later) at Police Station Cyber Crime NIT, Faridabad, Haryana, during the pendency of trial. 2. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case and is in custody since his arrest. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the investigation in the case already stands completed and no further custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required. It is further submitted that the trial ANU 2026.05.27 17:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-29277-2026 2 is likely to take considerable ti