Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-18

PRAKASH SINGH AND ANR vs MUKESH KUMAR AND ANR

Citation / case number
CR 5318/2024
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
PRAKASH SINGH AND ANR
Respondent
MUKESH KUMAR AND ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CR-5318-2024 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (137) CR-5318-2024 Date of decision: - 18.05.2026 Prakash Singh and another ....Petitioners Versus Mukesh Kumar and another .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Nipul Vashist, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma, Advocate for respondent No.1. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 20.08.2024 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bawal, whereby application filed by the petitioners under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC read with Section 151 CPC has been dismissed. 2. On 14.05.2026, this Court was pleased to pass the following order: - “Present: Mr.Nipun Vashist, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Mukesh Kumar Verma, Advocate for respondent no.1. *** Learned counsel for respondent no.1 has submitted that the impugned order whereby the application filed by the petitioners- defendants under order 22 Rule 10 CPC has been dismissed is an NARESH KUMAR 2026.05.18 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CR-5318-2024 -2- appealable orde