Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-12

PRADEEP vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRM-M 17671/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
PRADEEP
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-17671-2026 (O&M) 1 217 2026:PHHC:074166 aoe IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-17671-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 12.05.2026 PRADEEP ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA «+. RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG, Haryana. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) 1. Present is the first petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Section 439 CrP.C.) seeking grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.355 dated 08.12.2025, registered under Sections 190, 191(3), 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act (read with Sections 149, 148 and 307 IPC), at Police Station Sadar Rohtak, District Rohtak. 2. Briefly stated, the present FIR was registered on the statement of complainant Satish son of Ramdhari, resident of Village Ghilaur Kala, District Rohtak. As per the allegations, on 08.12.2025, while the complainant and his son Sagar were irrigating their wheat crop in the fields situated on Ghilaur-Chhichhrana road, accused Vicky son of Rajesh POONAM nadlegedly came there in the morning h