POOJA BANSAL vs SMT. HANSIRA AND OTHERS

141 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 6305 of 2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.05.2026 Pooja Bansal .......... Petitioner Versus Smt. Hansira and others .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Parveen Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. None for respondent No. 1. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main reference under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 already stands decided vide order dated 23.12.2025 by the learned Reference Court, thereby rendering the present petition as infructuous. [2] Dismissed as infructuous. [3] No orders are required to be passed in the pending application(s), if any, and the same shall stand disposed off. May 11, 2026 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) 'dk kamra’ JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2026.05.12 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document