PHULPATI vs UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERS

CWP-14011-2026 & CWP-14037-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 133+139 CWP-14011-2026 Date of Decision: 06.05.2026 Phulpati …Petitioner Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others …Respondents And CWP-14037-2026 Rohini …Petitioner Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Sunil Tandon, Advocate for the petitioner (through video conferencing) Mr. Akshay Kumar Dahiya, Advocate for Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate for respondents *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. As common issues are involved in the captioned petitions, with the consent of both sides, the same are hereby disposed of by this common order. For the sake of brevity and convenience, facts are borrowed from CWP No.14011 of 2026. 2. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to pay her compensation on account of death of her husband by electrocution. MOHIT KUMAR 2026.05.06 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-14011-2026 & CWP-14037-2026 -2- 3. As per petition, Sh. Hukam Singh (husband of petitioner