PAWAN YADAV vs STATE NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 14.05.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 657/2026 PAWAN YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Kaushik, Mr. Aditya Kaushik and Mr. Shubham, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with SI Gajender Singh. Counsel for complainant de facto (appearance not given) CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 487/2025 of Police Station Chhawla for offence under Section BAIL APPLN. 657/2026 Page 1 of 6 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Signature Not Verified Date: 2026.05.14 05:21:53 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:14.05.2026 17:28:50 316/318/324/326/340/329/351/61 BNS. 2. After last adjournment, the application CRL.M.A.15364/2026 was filed on behalf of the complainant de facto seeking permission to intervene in this anticipatory bail application. Copy of this application has already been supplied to counsel for accused/applicant. In view of settled legal position as well as in the interest of expeditious disposal of this anticipatory bail application, learned counsel for accused/applicant does not oppose this application. Accordingly, this application is allowed, making it clear that the accused/applicant did not file reply to the detailed averments in the said application only for expeditious disposal of this anticipatory bail application, so his not filing reply to this applic