Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-22

PAWAN @ PONY vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

Citation / case number
CRA-S 3865/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
PAWAN @ PONY
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

101-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-3865-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 22.05.2026 PAWAN @ PONY .....APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH. Present: Mr. Prashant Sethi, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, Addl. AG, Haryana. Mr. Lalit K. Narang, Advocate, for respondent No.2/complainant. SANJAY VASHISTH, J (ORAL) 1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant, challenging the order dated 09.12.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak, whereby anticipatory bail petition filed by him, in FIR No.377 dated 04.11.2025, registered under Sections 190, 191(1), 115(2), 351(3), 333 of BNS, 2023, and Sections 3(1)(B), 3(1)(S), 3(2)(VA) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, at Police Station Meham, District Rohtak, has been dismissed. 2. After hearing the submissions addressed by counsel for the appellant, on 11.12.2025, following order was passed:- “1. xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 2. Learned counsel for the appellant, inter alia, contends that in the present case, the specific accusation pertains only to co-accused Vijay, and