PAWAN CHOPRA vs ARIA MUNI

Judgment text excerpt

$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 08th May, 2026 + CM(M) 1065/2026 PAWAN CHOPRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Barak and Mr. Mayank Gakkhar, Advocate. versus ARIA MUNI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rohit Kumar Modi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J. 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 30901/2026 (for condonation of delay in re-filing) 2. The present application has been filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking condonation of delay in re-filing the present petition. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 48 days in re-filing the present petition is condoned. 4. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 30900/2026 (for exemption) 5. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM(M) 1065/2026 &CM APPL. 30902/2026 (for stay) Signature Not Verified Signed By:MANISHA CM(M) 1065/2026 Page 1 of 3 RAJPUT Signing Date:11.05.2026 11:11:41 6. The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the order dated 11th February, 2026 passed by the learned Trial Court in CS DJ 276/2025, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (“CPC”) has been disposed of. 7. Learned counsel for the respondent appears on advance notice and accepts notice. 8. The matter is taken up for hearing with the consent of learned counsel for the parties. 9. Heard. Record perused. 10. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that arguments had been advanced before the learned Trial Court on the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. However, the learned Trial Court disposed of the said appl