PARVEEN LATA vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 229 CRM-M-8630-2026 Date of decision: 01.05.2026 PARVEEN LATA ......Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: - Ms. Divya Menon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Paras Talwar, Senior DAG, Haryana. Ms. Anamika Sharma, Advocate Mr. Deepak Kundu, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is for quashing of FIR No.1118 dated 25.11.2019 under Sections 323, 354, 354-A, 354-B, 342 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Section 354, 354-A, 354-B and 34 of the IPC deleted later on) registered at Police Station Chandni Bagh, District Panipat along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 03.01.2026 (Annexure P-2). 2. The above FIR had been registered on the complaint of Meena VISHAL SHARMA 2026.05.05 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-8630-2026 -2- wife of Surjit Singh who alleged that she had been working as a maid in the house of accused Nishan Singh for the