PARSHOTAM LAL vs BANSO

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (226) RSA-3804-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision:-21.05.2026 PARSHOTAM LAL AND ANOTHER … Appellants Versus BANSO AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. None for the respondents. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that he has no contact with the appellants. Even the notice issued to the appellant No.1 received back with the report of his death. Appellant No.2 has refused to accept the notice and was served through affixation. No application for impleading the LRs of appellant No.1 has been filed. It seems that appellants have lost interest in pursuing the appeal. 2. As such, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the case on the docket, indefinitely. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. As a natural corollary, since the main case stands dismissed for want of prosecution of, all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, as no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping them pending. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) st 21 May, 2026 JUD