PARKASH vs STATE OF HY.

214 RA-CW-725-1999 AND CWP-14033-1999 (O&M) PARKASH AND OTHERS V/S STATE OF HRYANA AND ORS. Present: Ms. Preeti, Advocate for Mr. Nameet Khurana, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Sr. DAG Haryana. **** RA-CW-725-1999 On 3.12.1999 the following order was passed : “Cites 1989(2) Recent Revenue Reports 385 to contend that in view of the amendment of the definition of Shamilat Deh given in Section 2(g) of the Punjab Village Common Land (Regulation) Act, 1961 (as amended by Haryana Act No. 2 of 1981) the petitioner's house stood excluded from the definition of Shamilat Deh. In this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the order dated 4th an October, 1999 ought to be recalled as prima facie the order dated October 4, 1999 is contrary to the judgment cited by the learned counsel. Accordingly the order dated 4th October, 1999 is recalled. Notice of motion to the respondents. Mr. R. S. Tacoria, Addl. Advocate Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and prays for time to file the written statement. May do so within eight weeks. Replication before the next date. Stay dispossession meanwhile. JITENDER KUMAR 2026.05.13 14:13 I attest to the accurac