PARKASH vs RAM CHANDER AND OTHERS

RSA-4824-2013 (O&M) 1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 225 RSA-4824-2013 (O&M) Date of decision: 07.05.2026 Parkash ...Appellant(s) Vs. Ram Chander and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. S.K.Garg, Narwana, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishal Garg Narwana, Ms. Sukriti Jain, Mr. Shubham Goel and Mr. Nitin Sachdeva, Advocates for the appellant. Mr. Vicky Sharma, Advocate and Mr. K.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate for respondents No. 3, 4 and 6. *** NIDHI GUPTA, J. The plaintiff is in Second Appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned District Courts, whereby suit filed by the appellant for declaration and permanent injunction and possession, has been dismissed by both the District Courts. 2. It is inter alia submitted by learned Senior Counsel for the appellant/plaintiff that the Ld. District Judge, Jind, has erred in law in recording the finding that the plaintiff/appellant has failed to prove any fraud being played by leading any cogent and reliable evidence. It is submitted that it is the specific case of the plaintiff that the fraud has been played with him by the defendants no. 1 & 2 and the plaintiff whil