PARDEEP SINGH vs BANK OF MAHARASTRA THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND ANOTHER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 233 CWP-22373-2024 Date of Decision: 07.05.2026 PARDEEP SINGH ...Petitioner Versus BANK OF MAHARASTRA THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND ANR ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Baldev Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.1 (through V.C.). ***** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Counsel for respondent No.1 states that as petitioner did not make any deposit against the outstanding amount, mortgaged property has been sold in an auction held on 17.03.2026 and sale certificate has also been issued. 2. Petitioner is unrepresented. It seems that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ petition. 3. In view of the above, writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. ( SUVIR SEHGAL ) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) May 07, 2026 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2026.05.11 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment