Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-07

PARDEEP & ANR vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
CRA-S 1868-SB/2011
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
PARDEEP & ANR
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

AMIT RANA 2026.05.13 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judgement/order CRA S-1868-SB-2011 2 Teha sells poppy husk and if a raid was conducted, he could be apprehended with a heavy quantity of poppy husk. Subsequently, ASI Subhash Chander sent a message regarding receipt of secret information through Constable Hanif in writing to P.S.Ganaur, on the basis of which DDR No.31 dated 15.07.2008 was recorded. He also prepared the raiding party consisting of ASI Suresh Chand and EHC Ramesh Chand and reached the said Dhaba. Two persons were present there, but on seeing the police they tried to escape. They were holding plastic bags in their hands. With the help of other police officials, both the persons were apprehended and on enquiry they disclosed their names Pardeep son of Daya Nand and Sunil son of Jagat Singh. On suspicion that those persons were in possession of the Narcotic substances, notice under Section 50 of the Act was served upon them apprising them of their right to be searched either from a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate. The said persons opted to be searched before DSP Ganaur. Accordingly DSP Shri Badri Parsad was contacted, who reached the spot at 0