PARAMJIT SINGH DUGGAL vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

204+108 CHANDIGARH CRR-2989-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.05.2026 PARAMJIT SINGH DUGGAL ... PETITIONER VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Ms. Shravya Doomra, Advocate for Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Akshay Kumar, AAG, Punjab. Mr. P.S.Ahluwalia, Senior Advocate with Mr. Udaiveer Singh, Advocate, for respondents No. 4 to 6. Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate, for respondents No. 8 to 10, 15, 16, 19 to 21 and 23. Ms. Sushmeet Kaur, Advocate, for respondent No. 28. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) Memorandum of appearance on behalf of respondents No. 8 to 10, 15, 16, 19 to 21 and 23 and 28 have been filed in Court today and the same are taken on record. Learned counsel for the accused submits that, challenging the discharge, the complainant has come up before this Court by filing the present petition, whereas the State has also challenged the same by filing petition before the Sessions Court bearing No. CRR-368-2024. Counsel for the petitioner prays for transfer of petition to the first Appellate Court in view of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court passed in “Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, 2025(3) RC