Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-19

PANKAJ CHAUHAN AND ORS vs VINAY KUMAR, IRPS

Citation / case number
COCP 102/2025
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
PANKAJ CHAUHAN AND ORS
Respondent
VINAY KUMAR, IRPS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

[214] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-102-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 19.05.2026 Pankaj Chauhan and others …Petitioners versus Vinay Kumar, IRPS ….Respondent Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Shreenath A. Khemka, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nitesh Kaushal, Addl. AG, Haryana and Mr. Paramjeet Singh, DAG, Haryana. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) [1] Mr. Kaushal, has produced copy of the revised result of recommendees dated 18.05.2026, which is taken on record. [2] On the basis thereof, the recommendations will be made to the State within a period of one week. Thereafter, the State is granted 08 weeks’ time to act in accordance with law. [3] In view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition. [4] Disposed off. [5] All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed off. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 19.05.2026 ‘R. Sharma' Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.05.20 16:47 I agree to specified portions of this document