PAL SINGH AND ORS. vs UOI AND ANOTHER

SONIKA 2026.05.13 15:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document RFA-4116-2006 (O&M) and other connected cases --2-- Mr. D.C. Mittal, Advocate and Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate for respondent No.1-UOI. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. ***** HARKESH MANUJA J. (Oral) CM-9289-CI-2006 in RFA-4116-2006 CM-9292-CI-2006 in RFA-4117-2006 1. Prayer in this application for condoning the delay of 625 days in re-filing the respective appeals. 2. Notice of the applications. 3. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and waive filing of reply to the applications, however, prays for dismissal of the applications. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the averments made in the applications, the delay of 625 days in re-filing the respective appeals is condoned in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Ningappa Thotappa Angadi (Dead) through LRs Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer and Another, 2020 (19) SCC 599 and the latest exposition of law laid down in “Mohar Singh (Dead) thr. LRs and ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh Collector and ors.” reported as 2023 INSC 1019, whereby, delay of 12 years and 353 days was co